09-22-2017, 11:04 PM
(09-22-2017, 02:48 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Calm yourself.
I'll ask you a closed question, since you seem to like them. Is Matt's article more relevant to the topic at hand than Dill's?
LMAO
"Donald Trump applauded by Japan, South Korea for brazenness on North Korea in UN speech"
The author quoted one white guy from Canada who isn't affiliated with the government of Japan or South Korea who literally didn't use the word, "applause" a single time in any of his quotes. Hell, the author didn't even interview a single Japanese or South Korean person for their opinion of Trump's speech. While the leader's from Japan or South Korea haven't issued any statements regarding Trump's speech.
How is something which didn't happen more relevant than Dill's articles? Answer: it's not relevant. Therefore, no; Matt's article about something which didn't happen isn't more relevant than Dill's articles.
