Nancy Pelosi is too far Right for the Democrat base

[StLucieBengal]

(09-23-2017, 01:00 PM)GMDino Wrote:



Nooooooo.....it's alt right because you say you use sites to support your positions that are...




alt right!






I claim that the dailywire (please own it) stories are nothing but propaganda.  Never said they were bad for the board...just laughable.

When the original reporting is shown it is claimed that THAT story is biased.  

How many times as Matt or others posted legitimate articles that aren't even read but are responded too based on the headline?

How many times has a post been take line by line to point out the fallacies and bias only to be written off due to a misspelled word or the EXACT definition used in a particular sentence?  Or, my favorite, simple responded too with an insult or cliche meant to imply that its is always someone ELSE who is not reading or studying.

The last thing I am is lazy when it comes to reading.  The first thing I am is skeptical when the source material is "admittedly" alt-right.



People get offended by everything.  Within this week, on this board, someone said they "must be racist" because they supported Trump when that was never said.  

People being offended doesn't make it right to simply lie about things or to use "being offended" to support a biased/racist/whateveristposition.

But the last line must explain why no one on the right ever complains about the "liberal media" or "liberal elites" in Hollywood and television...since conservative sources are "so popular".

Or it could be just a talking point to cover up a confirmed bias disguising as a "normal mid-western" libertarian.    

You do realize that in every dailywire article or even breitbart for that matter...... there is a direct link to the other reporting. So the article is a conservative point of view of the News. That has the leftist point of view in he original reporting.

These articles are the most balanced because you can directly link to the leftist pov reporting.