POTUS UN Speech

[*bfine32*]

(09-26-2017, 12:23 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: That's how Dill rolls.  Anything he thinks is correct and what you think is wrong.  Anyone he cites as a source is a scholar who cannot be impeached, anyone you cite is an unintelligent mouth breather.  His links support his argument, your links do not.  His polls actually mean something, your polls can be dismissed out of hand.  Having an argument of his called inane is an "insult", meanwhile he will denigrate your intelligence with his "thoughtful" commentary.  Dill and GM are the left wing versions of Sloppy and Dabo, so you must approach any "discussion" with them from that perspective.  I've said it many times, I never engage with them in the hopes of having a logical, well reasoned, discourse.  It's simply not possible with them.  I do it for the benefit of others reading these threads. 

We both know that Dill's articles were wholly irrelevant based on both the subject matter and time of their publishing.  We both know that Matt's article was an editorial, and thus merely the opinion of the author.  We also both know that it was still actually on topic and relevant.  Dill ignores it, or denigrates it, for the simple fact that he knows the above to be true but cannot admit it publicly.  

It's quite the shame how irrational the election of Donald Trump has made some of the used to be rational posters in this forum.

There are a few that are fighting through their hate for the man and his policies to remain somewhat rational.