Obama Shames Voters

[GMDino]

(10-01-2017, 11:28 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: I know you would like to broaden this thread out to manufacture me into some anti woman sexist.  

(09-29-2017, 09:06 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Yup.  

It's like none of them give women the credit for not voting for another woman who couldn't even keep her husband faithful to her.    Why would any woman vote for another woman who isn't strong enough to keep her family together?

(09-30-2017, 12:11 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: You are reading way too much into this....  

If she can't manage her home how can she manage a nation?  

Now as to blaming people......   if your wife cheats on you repeatedly over several years with several women.   Then it's on you if you stay with her and just take it.  Then it would be obvious that you have some sort of personal issue with yourself.   Maybe it's a lack of confidence, maybe it's just that you don't care about your family or marriage.    Either way you are not someone I am following into a foxhole.    

Pointing this out is not sexist.   It's merely pointing out that people do not follow the weak.

(09-30-2017, 06:51 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Hillary stayed married not because she desperately wanted to keep her family together.   She stayed because it helped her politically.

Having your husband be a serial cheater just makes your family look like a joke.    

And yes it's the woman's job to keep the family together and running.    They are actually built specifically for this task.

(09-30-2017, 09:12 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Ok we will go with that being false.  She didn't stay for her career.   She just stayed because she didn't have the confidence to break away.   The same way a battered woman stays with her abuser.    

Once again....  women pity these type of women they don't follow them.

(09-30-2017, 09:20 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: When someone hurts you there are only two options.   Remove that person from your life or keep them in your life and accept the shame of not being able to do anything about it.....  

In hillary's case she was cheated on with multiple women over multiple decades.  

Where do you think this makes her look anything like a leader?  And why do you think women want to be led by anyone who gets treated this way and then on top of it all ..... attacks the victims of her husband.

(10-01-2017, 04:10 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: This has zero to do with her being a competent politician.  It speaks to her character.    

I never said trump was a great presidential candidate.   But at least his wives left him when he stooged up his marriage.    I am fine with defining Trump as you choose to define him when we discuss this topic.   She lost to a TV game show host.    She wasn't a strong candidate because people questioned her character.

You should blame the cheater.   But the cheated needs to move on if they want to claim any sort of sense of leadership.   No one respects a leader who just sits there and gets humiliated by the people closest to them.

(10-01-2017, 10:24 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Hiding behind nuance is pretty weak.   Especially when nuance exists to everything.   THe question was put forth about why women were "sexist" against hillary....   explaining her weak character is valid.    Part of that weak character is allowing your husband to cheat for decades.    That's fine for a kept woman who just lives a life.    But she wanted to lead the free world.      

Thankfully women saw through her bs and could easily see she was weak.    And if his was the old south...... her father and brothers would have kicked Bill's tail decades ago.    And since that never happened she looks weak.

(10-01-2017, 11:28 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: So the topic on why women didn't vote for Hillary shouldn't include anything which may have turned off women voters to Hillary?  

Hillary's husband never had a massive drinking problem.   He has a sex with anyone except his wife problem.   She obviously couldn't keep him happy enough to at the very least stay in her bed.    

Yep, that's me trying to make someone look sexist.

Anyway the topic of cheating was brought up by the guy trying to not "look sexist".

And there were probably people who voted against Clinton and for a "man" who would propose things that go against the interest of most women. There are always those who think they know how others should raise their families. (They are usually called Christians.)

But being cheated on isn't want Obama was talking about. Everyone knows it. Some just want to make a point about the "weaker sex".