10-02-2017, 12:04 AM
(10-01-2017, 11:43 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: Yes, any reasonable man understands accusing another man of crying is an insult. Pretending it isn't is Lucie level trolling.
Sorry, I'm trying to incorporate the new definitions of manliness that I'm told we must respect.
Quote:At least it is in Ohio, New York, Tennessee, Georgia, Texas, Florida, Kentucky, Maine, and any of the other places I've lived. Maybe it isn't in California which might be part of the problem.
Careful, you'll be accused of being a right wing extremist, white supremacist, in no time with that kind of talk!
Quote:Attempting to get you banned? I'm not attempting to get you banned. That's absolutely ridiculous. Pretending like I am is more pants wetting hysteria.
Sorry, I seem to have been influenced by the left coast pants wetting hysteria. I will endeavor to correct my failings.
Quote:Cool. You first. Explain how thinking "Jesus ***** Christ" so that no one around me knew my reaction can be construed as pants wetting hysteria. It doesn't hit close to home at all, but what it does do is point out your miguided judgment and lack of reason.
You seem to be very focused on being lumped in with the people given to over reaction. In the spirit of fostering amity, I humbly retract any association I may have insinuated you with those exhibiting such an over the top response.
Quote:A person who believes "Jesus ***** Christ" is pants wetting hysteria clearly doesn't have good judgment or is a reasonable person when it comes to this subject.
Well, unless those they are commenting on, are actually exhibiting, pants wetting hysteria. In which case they are exhibiting perfect judgment.
Quote:I am arguing the point at hand by pointing out your complete lack of objectivity.
I'll make more sense? That's just an insult to call me stupid within the limitis of the code of conduct It's the same crap you accused Dill of doing.
I don't think you're stupid at all, although I appreciate your acknowledging this exact tactic where Dill is concerned. I think you've set yourself against a perceived injustice and are willing to argue the point to the "death". I can respect this, I just feel you're lumping yourself into this category is being done by perceived insinuation.
Quote:Cool, again. Explain how a reasonable person believes thinking "Jesus ***** Christ" is pants wetting hysteria? That's example one. Calling me a member of some "ilk" because I thought "Jesus ***** Christ " is example two. Calling me a part of the far left because I thought "Jesus ***** Christ" is example three. You made all these assumptions about me because I . . . thought . . . three . . . ***** . . . words.
Again, I respect your sensitivity to this insinuation and retract it.
Quote:Just another sesuipedalian insult calling me stupid within the limits of the code of conduct instead of just simply calling me stupid. No, I'm not trying to have you banned, but I know when some is calling me stupid no matter how many words they use to do it. Claiming I'm trying to get you banned for recognizing an insult as an insult is example four of pants wetting hysteria.
I'm not trying to obfuscate by using polysyllabic words, I'm merely trying to make my point. I honestly have no grudge against you, our personal preference for home defense ammunition aside, I have nothing but respect for you, sincerely. I will add, not contradictorly, that you have lumped yourself in with those who do not exhibit the same degree of discerned disagreement.
Quote:Subsumed by the hate froth wipped up by a few on this board? Dude, all I did was think "Jesus ***** Christ" when I heard Trump say "rocketman" during his speech at the UN and here you are insincerely "sincerely" telling me I'm better than the hate froth. LMFAO Your entire last paragraph is example number five.
I will, again, apologize, for lumping you in with the knee jerk reactionaries I was hoping to address. I hope you will accept this apology.
