We should be 4-0

[THE PISTONS]

(10-04-2017, 02:09 PM)PhilHos Wrote: And if we had the offense we had the last couple weeks, we probably win 27-10. Remember, a poor offense can have an effect on how a defense does, even a good defense.


C'mon, man, I know you're not stupid, please don't act like you are. I clearly said that had he been the OC from the beginning, going into the GB game after 2 wins, the offense would've been far more confident and we would've done far better as a team against the Packers.


I wish people would stop saying this. This is isn't Lazor's first time being an OC, so there's already tape on him. Secondly, we didn't do well just because we had a new OC that no one has ever seen before. We also have goo dplayers that are able to execute the OC's plays (well, except for the OL, anyway).

Lastly, if teams can somehow look at the tape from the last 2 games and shut down our offense, then Lazor's not a good OC anyways. 


You're entitled to your opinion and I respect yours, but I just feel that had Lazor been the OC from the beginning, we're sitting at 4-0 right now.

We beat a team that is 1-19 over their past 20 games and you suddenly think Lazor has developed some unbeatable offense.

The offense was mediocre against the Packers. Good in the 1st half. Terrible in the 2nd half and not good enough to win. 

The big issues we have are: 1) Our offensive line is terrible.
2) Our running game is terrible

Lazor is limited in what he can do to fix either of those issues.