10-06-2017, 05:31 PM
(10-06-2017, 04:28 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: Disagree with a lot of this...
1 - We beat down the Browns worse than anyone else by far, has to speak for something, they are an NFL team afterall.
2 - The Packers still have the best QB in the league in my honest opinion, never going to be easy to beat that team in their
house ever. They still had Jordy Nelson and Ty Montgomery on Offense and Clay Matthews on Defense. If it wasn't for Marv
telling our OC to take our foot off the gas and a missed kick we beat a great team in their place.
3 - The O-line is not talented, that is our problem and you know it. AJ Green, Gio, Mixon are all very talented.
4 - Core does have more upside than Lafell, he is faster and blocks more physical. Hell, that is why Simmons wanted him in
the first place, he can be a physical blocker and i have seen him block well. Just needs a chance. Lafell has shown he isn't
cutting it clearly. Give Core or Malone a shot and see what they can do. They cannot prove it until they get a shot man.
1. Not really.
2. You're right. But we had a 21-7 jump and still couldn't do anything on offense in the second half without Mike Daniels and Nick Perry. That's bad. It isn't good. That's when you SHOULD be able to put up 30 points against a bad defense without it's best players.
3. You say it as if I have defended them? Mixon and Gio are heavily reliant on the OL (bad) and QB (not good enough). AJ is reliant on the QB. Lafell is bad. Core isn't better than Lafell. Boyd has been bad. Erickson looks like our second best WR. Kroft is meh. Eifert and Ross don't count until they can actually play. Hill is bad. 3 good players doesn't make the offense talented.
4. If he blocked better than Lafell right now, he'd play. Lafell has been detrimental to the run game as much as any OL. You prove it in practice. If you have drops, or round routes off in practice you won't play. It's that simple.
