Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Enviromental Pollution Agency
#79
(08-15-2015, 12:35 PM)jakefromstatefarm Wrote: The reason is confusingly called “tax expenditures,” a doublespeak term designed to legitimize special interest tax breaks and loopholes.

Those ‘expenditures’ will cost the U.S. government $628.6 billion over the next five years, according to a 2010 report from the Tax Foundation. With advice from the Urban Institute’s Eric Toder, one of the country’s foremost authorities on corporate tax policy, we assembled the 10 most costly corporate tax loopholes and who benefits from them.

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/corporate-tax-breaks-2011-2#ixzz3itjwII5q


So you think that 628.6 billion over 5 years of increased revenue is going to make that big of an impact?  That's roughly 125 billion dollars per year.  Do you think that every state having an increase of 2.5 billion dollars to spend per year on social programs is going to make a dent in anything? 

By comparison, it costs nearly 500 billion per year to operate the IRS.  

The ENTIRE cost of the food stamp program that you have been squealing about is $80 billion per year.

So you tell me.





Messages In This Thread
RE: Enviromental Pollution Agency - GMDino - 08-10-2015, 03:10 PM
RE: Enviromental Pollution Agency - GMDino - 08-10-2015, 03:21 PM
RE: Enviromental Pollution Agency - GMDino - 08-10-2015, 03:53 PM
RE: Enviromental Pollution Agency - GMDino - 08-10-2015, 04:08 PM
RE: Enviromental Pollution Agency - GMDino - 08-11-2015, 01:01 PM
RE: Enviromental Pollution Agency - GMDino - 08-12-2015, 11:23 AM
RE: Enviromental Pollution Agency - GMDino - 08-12-2015, 11:40 AM
RE: Enviromental Pollution Agency - GMDino - 08-14-2015, 09:11 AM
RE: Enviromental Pollution Agency - GMDino - 08-13-2015, 08:12 PM
RE: Enviromental Pollution Agency - fredtoast - 08-15-2015, 12:44 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 9 Guest(s)