Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Corker v Trump
#8
(10-10-2017, 12:09 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: Yeah, that is something I think a lot of people missed on the Alabama situation. He endorsed the establishment candidate, likely based on pressure from those around him. Trump's ideologically aligned with the one that won much more so than the guy he endorsed.

This is exactly why I read ideologically extreme sources such as Breitbart and HuffPo, to get the perspectives of people I would otherwise have no exposure to (thank god), even though it is frequently nauseating/upsetting.  I think that's why so many people were/are mystified by the positions of the "other side" because they take no time to even attempt to understand them.  Understanding and acceptance are not synonymous.





Messages In This Thread
Corker v Trump - BmorePat87 - 10-10-2017, 10:57 AM
RE: Corker v Trump - GMDino - 10-10-2017, 10:59 AM
RE: Corker v Trump - BmorePat87 - 10-10-2017, 11:10 AM
RE: Corker v Trump - GMDino - 10-10-2017, 11:15 AM
RE: Corker v Trump - Sociopathicsteelerfan - 10-10-2017, 12:02 PM
RE: Corker v Trump - BmorePat87 - 10-10-2017, 12:32 PM
RE: Corker v Trump - GMDino - 10-10-2017, 12:35 PM
RE: Corker v Trump - StLucieBengal - 10-10-2017, 05:17 PM
RE: Corker v Trump - CKwi88 - 10-10-2017, 11:13 AM
RE: Corker v Trump - Belsnickel - 10-10-2017, 12:09 PM
RE: Corker v Trump - Sociopathicsteelerfan - 10-10-2017, 12:11 PM
RE: Corker v Trump - Belsnickel - 10-10-2017, 12:35 PM
RE: Corker v Trump - BmorePat87 - 10-10-2017, 12:44 PM
RE: Corker v Trump - Sociopathicsteelerfan - 10-10-2017, 01:31 PM
RE: Corker v Trump - BmorePat87 - 10-10-2017, 12:47 PM
RE: Corker v Trump - Belsnickel - 10-10-2017, 12:49 PM
RE: Corker v Trump - BmorePat87 - 10-10-2017, 01:58 PM
RE: Corker v Trump - Belsnickel - 10-10-2017, 02:58 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)