10-13-2017, 02:06 PM
(10-13-2017, 01:44 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: Randy Bullock
7 of 8 on FG's
9 of 9 on XP's
only 27 years old, capable of kicking for 10 more years at least.
The more people complain, the sillier they look. At least wait until Bullock stops looking like gold.
You don't do all kinds of research on a kicker and then draft him in round 5 I believe, then cut him. If they were that confident Bullock was the long term answer, they had a major screw up drafting a kicker. My point is simple and I said immediately, should have never been a competition in 1st place. It simply made no sense to spend that high a pick on a position most teams never use a pick of any kind.
My guess Simmons lobbied and won to draft Elliott.
As far as stats you loved to provide Elliott stats after he missed a 30 yard field goal, but yet you don't include his stats to date which are off the charts over 50 yards and a game winner from 61. I believe in 4 games he has kicked more 50+ yard field goals than Bullock in his entire career.
How about an update on the Elliott stats now? Then tell us we are silly again.
To say some are silly is silly based on the results to date.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
First 6 years BB - 41 wins and 54 losses with 1-1 playoff record with 2 teams Browns and Pats
