Trump to become first president to speak at anti-LGBT hate group's summit

[BmorePat87]

(10-13-2017, 02:32 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: Yeah, but has the left ever advocated for it to be legal? Do they hold giant parades and attack anyone who disapproves of it, while shoving it in everyone's face as often as possible? No, because that wouldn't play into their identity politics of getting them more voters. Hence the hypocrisy.



I never said children. Two consenting adults would still be illegal.

Yes, we do need to accept universal moral standards, the problem is that one side of society has unilaterally chosen and imposed those standards and labeled the other side "hate groups" if they don't agree.

Don't get me wrong, I obviously don't think incest or necrophilia should be legal and I do think gay marriage should be legal. I just brought them up to make the point that moral standards aren't something that's unanimous, and one side labeling the other side as hate groups if they disagree with their one-sided decision is absurd.

Now if they were actively calling for, seeking for, or facilitating the physical attack on these people, then sure, that sounds like a hate group. But having a strong differing opinion or rejection of acceptance against something shouldn't make you a hate group.

You're questioning my personal application of a word by invoking what "the left" has done, not me. I'm not sure if I follow that line of reasoning.

Also, sorry, I read incest but thought you said pedo. 

As far as your argument goes, I already stated that it isn't a matter of agreeing, just not actively trying to deny their civil rights. I stated that calling for discriminatory government practices and calling this class of people a detriment to society for something that only involves themselves is open hostility, qualifying them in my own view.