10-14-2017, 11:11 PM
(10-14-2017, 10:28 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: You could argue that the scales should be tilted to the draft pick that has (possibly) better potential over the guy who has a pretty substantial track record of when he's good and when he's not.
It was weighted in Elliott's direction. Marvin suggested as much. I'm paraphrasing, but he said something along the lines of "if it was anything close, obviously we would've went with Elliott".
It wasn't close.
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
