10-25-2017, 12:42 AM
(10-24-2017, 09:44 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Not sure of the point of this post. It is Texas State Law that a minor requires parental consent for an abortion and the 10th covers state rights. So I ask again:
Isn't the cliff notes of this that the teen should not have to follow the State laws because she is not a citizen?
If yes, say yes, if no say no. If no is the answer please explain the issue without saying "it's creepy" and posting a bunch of words.
And I wasn't sure of the point of your Cliff Notes post.
I posted this note because it describes a confluence of events which allowed a pro-lifer to legally (in the short term) use his office to impose his "family values" on total stranger in his custody. That is what I find creepy.
The bunch of words I posted amount to the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution and a supreme court case which establish a woman's right to choose--federal law trumps state law, has trumped it in this case.
There are no parents in this case--just a pro-lifer doing his best to impose his values on someone else.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)