10-25-2017, 07:29 PM
(10-25-2017, 07:18 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: Right now, I'm more interested in finding out who is benefiting from trying to bring this and the uranium deal thing back into the public eye. Someone is putting an agenda in motion by making sure things like this get back in the media circus, even though the information isn't really anything new. This causes the public to pay attention and results in lawmakers changing their agenda. So who benefits from this?
It's obviously Republicans hitting back for the whole collusion story which, to-date, seems to be largely a non-story and, perhaps, an abuse of power founded upon fabricated "evidence". Damage has been done, and now they'll go after their pound of flesh.
Very interesting that Mueller - 1 year into this investigation - was examining the Dossier and interviewed Steele. Is he looking into it because something has become relevant, or is he looking into it because he's questioning the very foundation of the entire investigation? The former explanation is an odd one well over a year into the investigation, but perhaps he is now tasked with trying to justify an investigation that has found nothing.
Let's also not assume that "Russian interference" was only designed to benefit Trump, rather than undermine the entire Democratic process. That would also "justifiably" put Clinton and the DNC on the radar.
--------------------------------------------------------
