11-01-2017, 11:57 AM
(11-01-2017, 09:11 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Carefully selecting the best of the world to come here is not a bad thing for this country.
I can agree that vetting immigrants as best we can is a good thing. The same way I believe in better background checks for gun ownership rather than gun bans.
Quote:Besides we have decades of illegals to comb through and we need to slow the amount of immigrants.
So we can't enforce the immigration laws on the books now, what makes you think we can enforce new laws any better?
If gun control won't stop criminals from illegally obtaining guns, what makes you think new immigration quotas will stop the illegal immigrants from immigrating illegally?
Quote:And yes I want to preserve what we have, we are worse off with ghettos of Third worlders who come here and refuse to speak the language.
The preservation of homogeneity is designed to keep white America white. The quota system of the 1924 immigration act is inherently racist by designed and increased the visas issued to white Northern Europeans at the expense of everyone else to include Eastern and Southern Europeans because they weren't white and Protestant enough.
In addition to being racist the quota percentage are completely arbitrary. For example, why 3% instead of 5%, 8%, 10% or any other percent.
Quote:We were better off under the 1924 act because we could control immigration and they were able to assimilate into our culture. Not just form theirs in a ghetto.
We were better off in 1924?
Okay, show me some objective data we were better off in 1924 compared to 2017 because I don't believe you.
Finally, we're going to need poor immigrants to fight our wars because true blue, red blooded patriots like you and Trump were too busy to serve in the military because you were too busy playing football and Trumps fictitious bone spurs prevented him from leaving the golf course in the 60s and 70s.
