Countdown to the next mass shooting

[*PhilHos*]

(11-10-2017, 01:50 PM)GMDino Wrote: It's not going to be an easy problem to solve, nor will everyone like any proposed solutions.

Okay, but first step is figuring out if there is a problem, and if so, what is it? You can't jsut say we have a "gun" problem. What does that mean? Do we have a mass shooting problem? Do we have a murder problem?

You can't address a problem without first addressing what that problem is. Everyone might not agree with the problem, but the more specific you can get in stating the problem the more effective you'll be in finding a solution.

Many times - usually after a tragedy like this - people are quick to say there's a problem in this country but then make some grandiose and vague statement as to the problem. That's not helpful and it's why a consensus is hard to find. 

(11-10-2017, 01:50 PM)GMDino Wrote: The Texas case is unique in that somehow the system that is in place already failed due to human error.  You can't eliminate THAT from any system.  But we can't just not have a discussion because it's "too soon" or "too long ago" or "nothing can be done" or "we already do enough".

Every tragedy needs to have d discussion.  

Sure, but there is a time for it and doing it immediately after (or even during the tragedy) is NOT hte time to do it. You can NOT propose solutions based on feelings and that's exactly what will happen if you look for solutions too soon. One needs to be as objective as possible and tha'ts nearly impossible when you're still reeling emotionally from a tragedy. 

For example, you're dad - who's been happily married to your mom for over 50 years - passes away. Do you discuss with your mom selling the house and/or her moving into a nursing home and/or your father's will before the funeral, during the funeral, immediately after the funeral, or at some point when she seems to finally starting to come to grips with the loss of her husband? 

It's not a perfect analogy, but I'm hoping you get my point.