Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Sessions considering second special councel
#18
(11-14-2017, 10:22 AM)Vlad Wrote: Why of course, "serious damage to our institutions"... as if not already damaged by democRATS.
Poster #2 that can't bring himself to admit that an investigation is warranted. At least you didn't go the bigfoot route.

Not sure if Sessions recused himself from Clinton. What would be the reason? I know he recused himself regarding Trump/Russia for which Trump was not pleased.
Regardless it is another special counsel he's considering appointing.
The person who needed to recuse himself was Mueller...he, Clinton, Comey, Obama and others all from the same rats nest...all believing a Clinton win was in the bag..
Had Clinton won none of this corruption would have been exposed.

Sessions pledged to recuse himself because of his behavior during the campaign, it seems.

I always find the smearing of Mueller, a Republican, to be interesting. When his name was first bandied about there was universal admiration on both sides of the aisle because of his reputation of being a straight shooting, no nonsense investigator. It didn't take long for certain segments to begin attempting to discredit this man they once held in high esteem. I'm inclined to see Mueller as the right man for the job given the reputation that precedes him and see attacks on his character and calls for his dismissal/resignation as political hackery and nothing more.





Messages In This Thread
RE: Sessions considering second special councel - Belsnickel - 11-14-2017, 10:39 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)