08-20-2015, 03:50 PM
(08-20-2015, 03:37 PM)jakefromstatefarm Wrote: I'm not sure how anyone can make an argument that it's more compassionate to kill a child than to keep it alive.
Now if a child were shown to have some serious disease or defect where they would spend their entire life suffering, okay. Same can be said for people already born I believe.
So a life with a neglectful mother and/or not enough food to eat or a life in the foster system (which isn't the best of situations in and of itself) would be preferable? There aren't enough adoptive parents out there now to fill the need for them.
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
