Lavar Ball - ingrate

[Dill]

(11-21-2017, 10:49 AM)Vlad Wrote: Yes it is Dill.
How many pages of examples would you like?
...or just let Dino tell you it doesn't exist.

Peaceful, law-abiding tea-party groups who cleaned up after their protests — and got legal permits for them — were signs of nascent fascism lurking in the American soul. Violent, anarchic, and illegal protests by Occupy Wall Street a few years ago or, more recently, in Ferguson, Mo., were proof that a new idealistic generation was renewing its commitment to idealism.

So when a rodeo clown wears an Obama mask outrage ensues, not only  by your common liberal but those  in public office.
The clown forced to undergo sensitivity training.
So Dill, the clown wears a Bush mask and you're gonna tell me it would be met with the same level of discourse?

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/395526/year-liberal-double-standards-jonah-goldberg

Thanks for the insight into your world of internet memes. Would it be fair to say that your view of US politics is wholly framed by this level of political discourse?

You understand that posting skewed, right wing propaganda is not the same level of evidence as what I've been offering?  No. You do not.
I have yet to see a post from you which evidences knowledge of US or world history and politics against which you could check right wing propaganda.

Your first meme inadvertently draws attention to the similarities between right wing Muslims and Christians view of gays.
And because you encountered it as someone who follows memes rather than political events, you have no idea what the "liberal response" was to Ahmadinjad's speech at Columbia. Or why a head of state might be invited to speak at Columbia and a reality show star not.

As for the Carter meme, you couldn't at least take the time to check Snopes to get some perspective?  Carter cancels visas for a country that has taken our embassy hostage. I guess as that bit of info passes through the right wing echo chamber, bits and pieces are added to create the desired full blown liberal hypocrisy. Soon there is no difference between cancelling visas from a country with which we are effectively at war and a "muslim ban" against random countries, some of who are our allies.

Finally you present a wholly imagined, wholly fabricated "if Obama were Republican" meme as if this alternative reality were fact and "proof" of hypocrisy anywhere but in that alternative reality. The ease with which your alternative reality and alternative facts are presented on the same level as non-alternative, existing reality of actually recordable events and actions is telling.

And THAT my friends is how people create and uphold double standards.

"Liberal hypocrisy" flourishes in the echo chamber where comparisons are shaped by selective evidence (or wholly imagined evidence, like your last meme) and exclusion. Your National Review article is a prime example. The argument depends upon what you don't know, not what you do.