08-23-2015, 10:34 AM
(08-23-2015, 10:20 AM)Belsnickel Wrote: Person walks into a bakery and asks for a wedding cake. They go through the entire process of the details until at the very end he asks "do you have any toppers with two grooms?" At this point the transaction ends because the baker refuses service.
If a baker will bake wedding cakes for other couples, but won't for a same sex couple, then it is because they are gay. That is the difference there. Masking it behind the defense of not agreeing with SSM is a farce. The reason, the root of the denial of service, is because they are gay. It's nothing more than attempting to use religion to discriminate.
Is it possible to prove that someone is using religion to discriminate? No, it isn't. If that were the grounds for a lawsuit, it would never see a courtroom.
What's wrong with using my example?
There is a difference between refusing to serve a gay and refusing to make a wedding cake for a gay couple.
