Zampese exonerated?

[*TheLeonardLeap*]

(12-19-2017, 10:05 PM)Brownshoe Wrote: The offense did improve a lot after we fired Zampese. We didn't score a TD under him the first 3 games. He dug a massive hole.

(12-19-2017, 10:17 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Lol, no redemption for Zampese, he sucked.  Really.  

When Lazor took over, things took an uptick, in a serious way.  Not his fault that he had no OL to work with, and players steadily got injured.

(12-19-2017, 10:18 PM)Stewy Wrote: You have selective memory problems.

Yup. Lazor isn't going to make anyone terribly jealous, but he did an okay job for coming in after the season started and having no OL/no non-AJ WRs.

Zampese was just really really bad. Not just how the start of '17 was historically bad, but even in 16 they were pretty awful, despite having Whit and Zeitler. They were also terrible in the redzone, and in scoring in general. The Bengals were the 24th scoring offense in 2016.

Judging the offense off the last 2 games feels awfully silly, considering the entire team has quit now. That's not a Zampese/Lazor thing, that's a Marvin thing.