Dont Refer To The 90's, This Is No Better

[*bfine32*]

(01-02-2018, 02:33 PM)Sled21 Wrote: The "90's" didn't just consist of two years.......

1990= 9-7
1991= 3-13
1992= 5-11
1993= 3-13
1994= 3-13
1995= 7-9
1996= 8-8
1997= 7-9
1998= 3-13
1999= 4-12

The "90's" were 4 years of 3-13, one season 4-12 and exactly 1 season over .500%
Those of you thinking this is the same as the 90's either weren't there or were evidently high.....

The 90s were an epic failure; perhaps one for the NFL record books, although it looks like the Browns of the 10"s will challenge it. A team that has made the playoffs 5 of the 8 years in this decade in no way compares to it,

WTS, a couple posters earlier made some points that I 100% agree with:

In a sick/twisted way I kind of miss the 90s. We knew we were going to lose and folks where happy with a win, this past week's being upset about a win shows just how far our focus has shifted. Also I got a leg up on the office "pick 'em the 3-4 times the Bengals won because I was the only one that ever beat them. 

Also we had Corey Dillon. Folks would be dogging me  about my Bengals and then I would bring up Corey Dillon; then they'd say: "You're right, that's a bad dude"