Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
CLEVELAND TRADE
#10
(01-05-2018, 10:22 PM)McC Wrote: They are picking 1 and 4.  If they handle their business and spend some of their vast cap space even moderately well, they could be next year's Rams.  This will not be accomplished with AJM as their QB. 

I can personally see no reason for them to want to do this.   There will be plenty of FA career backups for them to sign while they get their new rookie ready to take over.  Hell, for that matter, they can get as much out of Kizer as they would AJM.

And on the flip side, if AJM is somehow a stud ready to break out, I'll be damned if I want to be the one to give him to them.

0-16 to the playoffs next year? Let that sink in for a sec.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
CLEVELAND TRADE - whodey1967 - 01-05-2018, 09:50 PM
RE: CLEVELAND TRADE - BleedNOrange - 01-05-2018, 09:54 PM
RE: CLEVELAND TRADE - whodey1967 - 01-05-2018, 10:01 PM
RE: CLEVELAND TRADE - BrownAssClown - 01-05-2018, 10:00 PM
RE: CLEVELAND TRADE - whodey1967 - 01-05-2018, 10:04 PM
RE: CLEVELAND TRADE - Brownshoe - 01-05-2018, 10:19 PM
RE: CLEVELAND TRADE - whodey1967 - 01-05-2018, 10:29 PM
RE: CLEVELAND TRADE - McC - 01-05-2018, 10:22 PM
RE: CLEVELAND TRADE - whodey1967 - 01-05-2018, 10:34 PM
RE: CLEVELAND TRADE - McC - 01-05-2018, 10:45 PM
RE: CLEVELAND TRADE - McC - 01-05-2018, 10:33 PM
RE: CLEVELAND TRADE - BengalsRocker - 01-05-2018, 10:35 PM
RE: CLEVELAND TRADE - whodey1967 - 01-05-2018, 10:46 PM
RE: CLEVELAND TRADE - OB1 - 01-05-2018, 10:50 PM
RE: CLEVELAND TRADE - whodey1967 - 01-05-2018, 10:59 PM
RE: CLEVELAND TRADE - TKUHL - 01-05-2018, 11:40 PM
RE: CLEVELAND TRADE - StLucieBengal - 01-06-2018, 12:53 AM
RE: CLEVELAND TRADE - whodey1967 - 01-06-2018, 01:04 AM
RE: CLEVELAND TRADE - rfaulk34 - 01-06-2018, 01:25 AM
RE: CLEVELAND TRADE - bfine32 - 01-06-2018, 01:38 AM
RE: CLEVELAND TRADE - McC - 01-06-2018, 01:59 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)