That's racist! update.

[*bfine32*]

(01-12-2018, 01:37 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: It's because I was the first one to bring up this specific march and from the moment I did, you felt it necessary to use a different example than the one I referred to... I am trying to get back to what was being discussed, not what you've moved the example to...

I also didn't call you racist, so calm down. 

You don't need to defend your trashy comment, I just felt the need to tell you it was trashy given my profession. 

How the hell did I use a different example, in post #28 I point directly to the march in Charoletteville? Are you speaking of a different march or just losing your mind. 

Never meant to imply you called me a racist (we know you would never). I just suggested you would use the world instead of the word (racism) being discussed. Furthermore; I have no idea what leads you to believe I am excited. Amused yes; excited not so much.

Not defending just explaining how it was used in context. I find my use quite a bit different that if I were to be referring to members of your class. I get the point; however, I will continue to use the word as I see fit.