01-17-2018, 12:24 PM
(01-17-2018, 12:15 PM)GMDino Wrote: Yet folks say "they didn't vote for" whatever part of the agenda they didn't like...even though the voted for the candidate espousing that agenda.
What "folks" are you talking about? Generalities aren't helpful in this regard.
Quote:I guess that's okay?
Assuming your statement contains some degree of accuracy, I would also point out that it would be close to impossible for a person to agree with every single position a candidate espouses. Generally, in the adult world, we vote for the person we agree with the most, or who agrees with us on the issues we feel to be the most important.
Quote:If part of the agenda is giant vanity project that virtually every agrees is a waste of time and money should we NOT voice opposition and try to stop it just because the guy won?
Who is "we"? You and the Dems? The Dems would oppose him regardless, they made that clear on 11/08/17 when they already started talking impeachment. Not that the GOP was much more fair to Obama, but at least they had control of Congress to justify their obstructionism, checks and balances and all.
The bottom line is this, the Dems (the minority party in every regard) are, apparently, willing to shut down the federal government, an action that will hurt US citizens, because they aren't getting what they want on the subject of people who are in the country illegally. This is a fact, no amount of lipstick will make that pig any prettier.
