01-25-2018, 12:34 PM
(01-25-2018, 12:18 PM)fredtoast Wrote: No this is not ethical at all. The fact that you, as a police officer, thinks so is very troubling to me. Especially since the District Attorneys works so closely with police officers. You are basically admitting that if a police officer is charged with a crime then the District Attorneys office will give him a "favorable outcome" under some sort of "ethical" discretion.
Interesting that you didn't answer the question I posed you. It's OK, we all know the real answer. Also, you've created a straw man by addressing an argument I didn't make.
Quote:Also we are talking about THIRTY A YEAR for EVERY SINGLE OFFICER. That goes way beyond just helping out a family member every once in a while unless all of these officers are member of a crime syndicate family. It is clear that these cards were traded for favors or sold for cash. That is legalized bribery. Giving an officer cash or a favor in order to get away with a crime.
Wait, you'll have to point me in the direction of the post in which I defended the NYPD cards.
Quote:This is proof of widespread corruption and abuse of the power by police officers.
In the case of these cards I'd agree, they are unethical.
