01-26-2018, 12:57 PM
(01-26-2018, 12:40 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Typical lawyer babble and obfuscation. Who is denying the existence of inflammatory rhetoric? Who has claimed that it is not against the law to "incite violence"? Thank you for adding nothing to the conversation but irrelevancies.
(01-24-2018, 12:13 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Sorry kids, I'm in the "adults are responsible for their own actions" camp.
How can you agree that it is against the law to incite violence with language at the same time that you don't hold the speaker responsible for the violence committed by someone else?
These seem to be contradictory positions because "inciting violence" is holding someone responsible for the actions committed by another person
