03-01-2018, 12:43 PM
(03-01-2018, 12:39 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: I disagree. It makes sense to protect people. It doesn't make sense to refuse to protect group A because you disagree with giving something to Group B even though protecting group A would give nothing to group B.
But this also has nothing to do with you jumping around from topic to topic in an endless attempt to not address your inability to show that Feinstein is "radical".
She'd be a radical fascist in Europe. Just ask Matt.
![Tongue Tongue](http://thebengalsboard.com/images/smilies/tongue.png)
“History teaches that grave threats to liberty often come in times of urgency, when constitutional rights seem too extravagant to endure.”-Thurgood Marshall
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)