Remember When Obama Took The Guns?

[GMDino]

(03-02-2018, 12:08 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: No one said it didn't entitle the person to a full hearing.  Quit arguing points that aren't being made.  What is being said, and it is true, is that this type of law allows for the confiscation of private property without the opportunity of the accused to defend themselves.  You don't think that having to lug all your firearms, and ammunition, to a dealer, who will charge you for the storage, or to your local police station is a significant burden?  That the stigma of having to do so isn't real?



In such cases the person is almost always entitled to be cited out and released OR.  It would be out of the norm for a person to be detained in jail based on nothing more than a person's word.  Even in those cases the accused will see a judge within 48 hours (business day hours).  Is such a short turn around time guaranteed under these restraining orders?  Absolutely not, as that is the amount of time allotted to the accused to surrender their private property.

However, as usual, we are arguing minutiae, the point was that what Trump stated already occurs.  This isn't really a fact in dispute.

Wouldn't the stigma of being accused of domestic violence be more of a concern to an innocent person than having to give up their guns for a day or so?