03-02-2018, 01:12 PM
(03-02-2018, 01:08 PM)GMDino Wrote: I have simply asked why the guns are more important than the potential safety of the alleged victim. If the accused is simply removed from their residence they also do not have access to their private property. Any difference? In that case they didn't take his guns away from him...they too him away from his guns.
Is there any difference between not being able to go home for a few days and having to take all your firearms and ammunition to a gun dealer, paying them to store it, or a police station? Seems like this question answers itself. Your question also supposes that the accuser and the accused reside in the same residence, which would be required for the accused to be affected in the former, and not the latter, example.
