Bengals interested in Jordy Nelson

[*TheLeonardLeap*]

(03-13-2018, 11:26 PM)Truck_1_0_1_ Wrote: While it wouldn't hurt us in the slightest, we don't need him.

Run a good gameplan and shore up the line, we have good enough receivers for the offense we have; we don't throw 50 yard bombs all day like GB.

What does that even mean, Truck?

They had good enough wide receivers for the 27th ranked passing offense last year. How do you look at it and go "nah, we're good"? Was it a planned 27th passive offense, and any better would mess up the plan or something?

 Lol... just such a weird statement that somehow this offense makes better players somehow unnecessary. As if Lazor is talking to Marvin and Mike "Whatever you guys do, don't give me any WRs not named AJ Green who can run good routes, get open frequently, or make big plays. That'll just mess up EVERYTHING for my LaFell-5-yard-pass offense."




BTW: The Packers were in a 3-way tie for 17th in passing plays of 40+ yards. The year before they were in a 4-way tie for 10th. The year before that they were in a 3-way tie for 29th. Apparently that's throwing 50 yard bombs all day?