Wife of 7th Special Forces Group vet faces deportation under tighter immigration rule

[BmorePat87]

(03-15-2018, 06:35 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Was that the memo you posted earlier that said granting parole was discretionary and doesn't erase any previous periods of unlawfulness? Perhaps like defying a deportation order prior to marrying the Military member?

I just want to make sure I am basing my "emotional" beliefs on the same memo that you are posting your analytical memo.

Now if someone where to dismiss the deportation order, then it may apply............Hey, wait a minute......



I have given my stance and it is not based in emotion, because if it was, I'd back the Soldier and his family in this case without exploring the merits of it. No one is "ignoring" a memo maybe, just maybe the memo is not the smoking gun you find it to be and is ambiguous in nature. 

The argument was made that someone with a removal order is not eligible, which is false. Nothing in their internal memo on how to implement the policy suggested people with removal orders were barred, something that is backed up by the article mentioning the fact that it occurred in the past. 

Quote:I have 0 idea what Ben Carson has to do with this.   

Just a pattern of documentation from government agencies correcting false assumptions.