Wife of 7th Special Forces Group vet faces deportation under tighter immigration rule

[*bfine32*]

(03-15-2018, 07:43 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: The argument was made that someone with a removal order is not eligible, which is false. Nothing in their internal memo on how to implement the policy suggested people with removal orders were barred, something that is backed up by the article mentioning the fact that it occurred in the past. 

Even the part that stated that it does not erase any previous periods of unlawfulness? That equals "nothing"?

I get you've made your bed an go with things like "ignore" and "emotional" when folks that can read can plainly see neither is the case. 


I must say I'm still lost on the Ben Carson reference? Are you attempting to construct an Ad hominem argument?