Paid Protesters Protest not getting Paid

[GMDino]

(05-22-2015, 01:51 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: If you truly trust your wife, you wouldn't even ask her, and jeopardize that trust.  


But, since you admitted that you would confront her in that scenario, you tacitly admit that you would be suspicious.  In order for suspicion to exist in your mind, you would totally have to believe that there was a possibility that something terrible may have happened.  (kind of like the old smoke and fire analogy)

But that is not what you asked:

(05-22-2015, 01:34 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Let me ask you this;  Suppose you look at your wife's phone, and notice a text from another man.  The text says something on the order of "Last night was great, can't wait to see you again".  Are you going to suspect that she was messing around, or do you need hardcore footage of her getting boned by the dude?

Of course I'd ask what it was about...but with the assumption of innocence as the text is no kind of proof of anything. That is completely different from assuming its true vs hardcore proof. And if you DON'T trust your wife to the point that a single text from another man makes you totally suspicious and assuming the worst than you already had your suspicions and were looking for anything that provided "proof".

And in the end what the OP said was clearly wrong based on the "proof" he offered.