03-23-2018, 09:54 AM
Paragraph one is on the President.
3-28%? Pretty big gap. I read about half so far, and once I got into the study, I saw a whole bunch of ways Fox DIDN'T affect anything, which I'm sure they will explain how I didn't read what I read later. Did you know that places with Fox rose 5+% while places without Fox rose 7+% in Republican voters, but that's not really real. Maybe in the 2nd half they will discuss Clinton fatigue since it's comparing 1996 to 2000. It's just possible that some independents wanted to move on. Or perhaps maybe Gore wasn't quite the candidate Clinton was and so independents moved on. I wonder what the difference between 2004 and 2008 was. I mean comparing one presidential election to the next and coming up with causation? But I've only read about half so maybe they do more.
3-28%? Pretty big gap. I read about half so far, and once I got into the study, I saw a whole bunch of ways Fox DIDN'T affect anything, which I'm sure they will explain how I didn't read what I read later. Did you know that places with Fox rose 5+% while places without Fox rose 7+% in Republican voters, but that's not really real. Maybe in the 2nd half they will discuss Clinton fatigue since it's comparing 1996 to 2000. It's just possible that some independents wanted to move on. Or perhaps maybe Gore wasn't quite the candidate Clinton was and so independents moved on. I wonder what the difference between 2004 and 2008 was. I mean comparing one presidential election to the next and coming up with causation? But I've only read about half so maybe they do more.
“History teaches that grave threats to liberty often come in times of urgency, when constitutional rights seem too extravagant to endure.”-Thurgood Marshall
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
