Paid Protesters Protest not getting Paid

[*bfine32*]

(05-22-2015, 02:00 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: You're attempting to say that our logic is that since they were paid for travel, they weren't paid salaries. Both Dino and myself noted that we reject the hired statement because there's no evidence.  

Nope, right here Dino proclaims his link is "proof" that they were not hired to protest (even put it in caps)

(05-21-2015, 11:42 AM)GMDino Wrote: Because they weren't HIRED to protest and then shipped there are the conspiracy people like to think...and post.

They can request to reimbursed for what they did.

(05-22-2015, 01:43 PM)GMDino Wrote: Were they hired to protest and promised money as you said?

I didn't say they were. I merely posted a link that stated they were. I think I've said more than once in this thread; I do not "know". And usually not "knowing" puts you in the minority around here. For instance you 'know" they weren't paid to protest because you have a link that shows they were paid to travel.

The only similarities between the two is the funds are funneled through the same organization. Your link speaks of travel only and indicates a $20,000 cap. The OP mentions nothing of travel and lists funds of $50,000 in compensation already paid and another $57,000 expected.

How in "Dinoworld"  does one article do anything to disprove the other?

Apparently tweets from the individuals and an open source letter from the protesting organization's website is not enough. Admitedly some Right Wing blogs have ran with and perhaps embelished the story. I'll bet if Mother Jones or Huffinton Post posted that ish; you'd be all over it, but Washington Times is to be ignored.