03-29-2018, 05:42 PM
(03-29-2018, 04:20 PM)3wt Wrote: Made no sense to me. Tucker and his cadre of guests are usually spot on - but he has a pretty tight time slot, so maybe there was little enough change with him that he was not deemed necessary to comment on. Most sites have Price anywhere from 1st to 2nd, so I would think that's where he will go. I'd be very happy for him to be a Bengal.
Must of been out of time no doubt.
If you are talking about the top Center prospects Price is right there with Daniels and Ragnow regardless of the injury.
(03-29-2018, 04:35 PM)ochocincos Wrote: Ragnow is also more experienced at C compared to Price and is a safer prospect. Bengals also attended Arkansas Pro Day so the interest is there.
Given the gaping hole at C, I think the Bengals might prefer Ragnow due to earlier availability on the field, well-roundedness against both the run and pass, and three years of experience at the position (in the SEC no less).
It actually wouldn't surprise me if the Bengals took him at 21 although I'd consider it a "slight" reach. But I'd rather reach a bit for a guy like Ragnow than gamble he won't be available at 46 if he's my favorite C prospect.
Nice post man, didn't know we attended the Arkansas Pro Day. Ragnow had to be the main guy we were looking at.
O-lineman, especially Centers need time to gel with the rest of the guys, having the earlier availability should definately give
Ragnow an edge, especially here where we just added a new LT and have young guys battling at RG and RT.
I know Pollack didn't attend OSU's Pro Day, this could mean something.
Completely agree i would rather reach and grab Ragnow at 21 then gamble and hope he is there at 46.
(03-29-2018, 04:37 PM)3wt Wrote: I would be happy taking Ragnow at 21. But 99% sure that would never happen.
Why? Cause Hobspin said we might look to take a Center at 21?
