03-30-2018, 06:51 PM
(03-30-2018, 02:55 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: I'd kindly request you reference any talking points I made in my OP.
This was addressed in great detail after he said it. No one responded to it because no one thought he'd take the slightest steps towards actually doing it. We turned out to be 100% correct.
Sure there's a middle ground, we're residing in it right now. You are correct, not all Dems are anti-2nd. A disturbingly high 39% of them want to repeal the 2nd amendment though.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2018/03/27/one-in-five-americans-want-the-second-amendment-to-be-repealed-national-survey-finds/?utm_term=.76a731c92d46
All long guns are better killing machines than a handgun (with obvious exceptions such as a .22lr). Adding "assault weapon" (which is ironic giving your previously stated aversion to "talking points") as a qualifier is meaningless. Unless you can tell me what makes a long gun an "assault weapon" as opposed to a rifle.
You are using something a kid and retired guy said and jumping straight to the mask is off... With the implied point... Liberals coming to take the guns.
Neither have any legal power. Yet the dude running the show says some stuff about how he actually feels about taking guns. And it is magically brushed off?
The assault rifle comment was in response to michaelsean saying equal or greater damage could have been done with a handgun. Not far fetched. But i disagree.
No evidence to present to back my claim. But im pretty sure you have a better chance of surviving a handgun round than rifle round.
