04-16-2018, 11:49 AM
(04-16-2018, 11:33 AM)BmorePat87 Wrote: Well, he was convicted of perjury and obstruction of justice in a case involving someone leaking to the reporter (who you're referencing as the witness) and the claim was he was the source, so he was a leaker (according to the court).
Basically the reporter said years later he wasn't her source. This is also a reporter who was discredited at the time for making up stories to promote and anti-Islamic view.
So was she lying that her access to high level information was from Libby or was she lying that it wasn't Libby? Either way, someone in his circle leaked the information as a means of political retribution.
Didn’t they conclude that the leaker was Richard Armitage? Perhaps I should go refresh my memory on the situation.
“History teaches that grave threats to liberty often come in times of urgency, when constitutional rights seem too extravagant to endure.”-Thurgood Marshall
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
