04-17-2018, 01:22 PM
(04-17-2018, 01:01 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I must admit that the arguments between Justices confuses the hell out of me at times, but in reading this it appears Gorsuch states the severity is Life, liberty, or property; but burglary doesn't fit this?
(04-17-2018, 12:58 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: This would have been Scalia's position, as well. The vagueness of the law would typically mean going in favor of the individual, not the government. That was a Scalia trademark, as well.
I took it as just the law was too vague...although I think Gorsuch's example is a bit vague/open to interpretation also.
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media0.giphy.com/media/1kwsTjL8BNqlszNtnCE/giphy.gif)
Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.