Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Do you feel we "settled" for Price?
#79
(04-29-2018, 12:17 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: You're leaving an important part off of the phrase.  It's BPA that fits an area of need.  

And from reading the rest of your post, it seems like you just may have had yourself so set on Daniels that you weren't willing to accept any other possibilities.  As for Daniels being better than Price?  Eh, not so sure Daniels would fit what the Bengals want in a Center.  If you read both of their draft profiles on NFL.com, you would know that Price was said to be better at facing NTs.  The Bengals face off against the 3-4 defense 8 times this year, in the regular season alone.

Daniels was a better long term prospect who fits what we want to do better in a zone blocking scheme.  He's only 20 and every scout agrees he has way more upside.   Here's another tidbit to mull over, Price was the 27th ranked center last year against the pass.  (PFF) I mean, when Ohio State was so far behind in all those games and opposing teams were just teeing off on the QB explains....wait, what?  
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Do you feel we "settled" for Price? - yang - 04-30-2018, 12:02 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)