Poll: Should the Bengals have traded up past DET to get Ragnow?
Yes!
No, Price is fine and the extra pick(s) not worth giving up
[Show Results]
 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 2 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
If Ragnow was really the target at 21...
#27
(05-03-2018, 10:31 AM)ochocincos Wrote: This article on Cincy Jungle seems to indicate the Bengals should have traded up past DET to get Ragnow if he really was their guy, but teams knew they likely wouldn't.
https://www.cincyjungle.com/2018/5/3/17311958/nfl-execs-insiders-critical-bengals-drafting-billy-price-round-1

If Ragnow was really the target for the Bengals at 21 (which most believe), should the Bengals have considered giving up a pick (or picks) to move ahead of DET? It likely would have only cost a 4th rounder to trade up to 19/20.

I personally vote yes, especially when the 4th rounder resulted in "just" another RB.

Give up a 4th rounder just to move up one spot?  Remember, Geno Atkins was a fourth rounder.  And I like Price.  He's a highly rated center who wanted to be a Bengal.  That is rare.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: If Ragnow was really the target at 21... - BonnieBengal - 05-03-2018, 01:58 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)