05-04-2018, 11:26 AM
(05-03-2018, 11:16 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: You've already stated you would. I pointed out that opposition to an unjust law is justifiable in the mass shootings thread. Your response;
You're not allowed to decide if a law is unjust in Fredtoast's world, hence you would support Jim Crowe. Odd, I asked you directly about that in my reply and yet you never responded. The mind bottles as to why.
Actually I said that I would fight against those laws any way I could. Through court battles or elections.
I would never just claim that I could follow whatever law I wanted. If I did chose not to follow a law I felt was unjust I would admit that I was a criminal for doing it. That is the problem I had with your position. You claimed that you could decide which laws to follow and that would not make you a criminal.
I never said you could not decide if a law was unjust. I just said that you have to challenge the law through legal means instead of just saying "I am not a criminal if I don't follow the laws I don't like."
