Poll: Should the Bengals have traded up past DET to get Ragnow?
Yes!
No, Price is fine and the extra pick(s) not worth giving up
[Show Results]
 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 2 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
If Ragnow was really the target at 21...
#81
(05-07-2018, 10:17 AM)Sled21 Wrote: A torn pec will heal.... no doubt about it. As to Glenn, he missed time due to bone spurs in his ankle. He had the surgery to remove the spurs. No spurs=no injury. He didn't tear anything, sprain anything, or break anything. Spurs, which are no longer there. None issue.....

Bone spurs is about as minor as surgery gets. You always hear about players getting spurs removed and I don't think they ever miss time from it.

Whitworth, Chad and so many Bengals greats have had spurs removed and been fine. 

(05-07-2018, 01:00 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Who the hell is this Ragnow guy?  He must have been the "flavor of the year" over in the draft forum.

I can't believe we got a center as good as Price and there is still a 4 page thread going on about another center.  If we were talking about two guys from the top 5 picks I could understand, but neither one of these guys was especially bad or super elite.  I don't see how there could have been so much difference between them that we would give up picks to take one over the other.  Ragnow was not a "steal" at 20 and Price was not a "reach" at 21.

I'll be honest, I knew way more about Price until all these Ragnow questions started surfacing. 

You'd think all this talk about Ragnow would die down some when people heard that the Lions drafted him to be a Guard.

I guess we got the better true Center prospect.  ThumbsUp
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: If Ragnow was really the target at 21... - Shake n Blake - 05-07-2018, 01:16 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)