Poll: Should the Bengals have traded up past DET to get Ragnow?
Yes!
No, Price is fine and the extra pick(s) not worth giving up
[Show Results]
 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 2 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
If Ragnow was really the target at 21...
#94
(05-06-2018, 04:35 PM)HarleyDog Wrote: Of course not. For the most part I believe it's MB trying to get talent cheaper. However, The last 2 1st rounds had injuries and even though that kinda blows my theory up, I still think it has merit. However, I do like what Duke said about JR.

https://bengalswire.usatoday.com/2018/05/06/john-ross-story-not-written-duke-tobin/

“The story is not written on John Ross. John is going to write that story this year, the next year and the year after. We have a lot of regard for him. We are very positive about him. He appears to be pretty close to healthy. He had his other shoulder done, but he is out there running routes and looks pretty good. New coaching staff, new offensive coaches are really positive from what they’ve seen so far.”

Price has to write his story.



From the article, in reference to the Bengals:   "that typically leans conservative and plays veterans over younger guys."


Get em', Fred....tell them how we play the same % of rookies, blah, blah, blah...
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: If Ragnow was really the target at 21... - SHRacerX - 05-08-2018, 06:05 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)