05-11-2018, 02:50 PM
(05-11-2018, 02:38 PM)GMDino Wrote: If consent once equals consent always there would never be need for a safe word.
A "safe word" is a verbal revocation of consent. It is like saying "no". That is the way it is supposed to work after consent has been established by a course of conduct. But that is not the way Bels and others say it should work. They say it is rape even if the victim never says "no".
The more I look at it the more obvious it becomes that they are coming up with these silly rules that they admit they don't even follow themselves just to address one specific situation.....sex with a person who is unconscious.
All they have to do is say it is not okay to have sex with a person who is unconscious. Instead they require that you have to get a "yes" before you touch your girlfriend and you even have to decide if she was "enthusiastic" when she said "yes" before you are allowed to do anything.
