Poll: Should the Bengals have traded up past DET to get Ragnow?
Yes!
No, Price is fine and the extra pick(s) not worth giving up
[Show Results]
 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 2 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
If Ragnow was really the target at 21...
(05-13-2018, 01:11 AM)bengalfan74 Wrote: It really baffles me when guys say Ragnow is clearly better or Price is a lot better, or Price isn't that good or whatever ? When the fact is it's all complete speculation at this point !

Price may end up a perennial all pro and Ragnow completely flop, or vice versa ? IF it was really that easy to predict a college prospects NFL greatness or awfulness for that matter the draft would be near perfect every time and it's not even close now is it ?

I'm just happy the Bengals have decided (finally) the O-line matters and got a seemingly good one in the first !

True enough.

I look at the Ragnow/Price/Daniels draft discussion similar to dating ...

Say you are interested in 3 ladies and know they're interested in you. One of the ladies is a 9 ... the others are a high-8 and a mid-8, respectively.

You give the 9 gal a call and find out that she's interested in going to a new expensive restaurant that just opened.

Would you blow an entire month's worth of date money to take her there?

Or would you "settle" for the high-8 that loves "greasy spoon" places?
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: If Ragnow was really the target at 21... - PV Bengal - 05-13-2018, 11:41 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)