05-18-2018, 07:43 PM
(05-18-2018, 05:28 PM)Dill Wrote: Now Lucy, so far you have been good about responding to questions with real answers.
We have covered a bit of this ground before, and I must say I do not see a clear definition of terrorism in your use of the term, since you apply it so one-sidedly. It's ok for Israel to have terrorists leaders and corruption at the highest levels, but it makes Palestinians "animals."
It's ok when Israelis take Palestinian land but totally unfair if they defend their homes--because Israelis will manage the land better.
Guy down the road from me lives in a run down property. If I go there with a gun and drive him and his family out of that property, US law will not side with me on grounds that "Dill will get the property back in shape so its better he has it." But that seems your criterion for dismissing ethnic cleansing--land is just better off under Israeli control.
So that is why I ask about your definition of terrorism. Is it one which could operate independently of racial, religious or ethnic predetermination?
Israel is not a terrorist nation. They are not trying to wipe anyone from the planet. If they were we would have been done with this Palestinian nonsense years ago. The Palestinians however want a genocide. Israel is a normal Nation who has used its resources to develop and grow a defense system. Palestinians have wasted their money on enriching their leaders and their families.
I don’t care about their religion or race. If the poor Palestinians wanted peace they would have it today. Instead they want to keep pushing until they just kill all the Jews. They arE by definition terrorists. Which is why I am beyond caring about Palestinians. I wish Israel would wipe them out and put them on the run. The problem is Israel doesn’t want to be forced dealing with the people in There who just love living in shanty towns.
