SCOTUS Rules About Colorodo Baker

[BmorePat87]

(06-04-2018, 10:47 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Ok, we all can agree that "narrow" was the message they wanted to put forth, but why?  I don't know too many people who think that 7-2 is a narrow margin, by any stretch.  

In football terms, that's like 49-14.  

It was a narrow decision, meaning the scope of the decision was very narrow. 

They made a decision regarding the treatment of the baker by the state commission and did not make a decision regarding whether or not he was allowed to refuse service or whether he could claim artistic expression. It failed to set a precedent for future cases regarding the refusal of service on the grounds of religious freedom.