06-04-2018, 11:23 PM
I know there's concern that the phrasing of "narrow" is a liberal attempt to rewrite the impact of this case, ignoring any history of "broad" and "narrow" being used to describe the scope of opinions, but here's a fun article I found from conservative outlet the Federalist.
http://thefederalist.com/2017/12/08/supreme-court-likely-rule-jack-phillips-dodging-big-religious-liberty-question/
The author completely called this decision months ago and suggested it was be a narrow opinion involving only the treatment of Phillips by the commission, hinging on Kennedy. Well called.
http://thefederalist.com/2017/12/08/supreme-court-likely-rule-jack-phillips-dodging-big-religious-liberty-question/
The author completely called this decision months ago and suggested it was be a narrow opinion involving only the treatment of Phillips by the commission, hinging on Kennedy. Well called.
![[Image: ulVdgX6.jpg]](http://i.imgur.com/ulVdgX6.jpg)
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)